Opinion
Criminal 1:22-cr-00069-MR-WCM-2
01-24-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. (2) TINA JANE HILL, Defendant.
ORDER
Martin Reidmger, Chief United States District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Tina Jane Hill's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 98].
On December 18, 2023, the Defendant Tina Jane Hill (hereinafter “Defendant Hill”), filed a Motion to Suppress seeking the suppression of all evidence obtained from an Anticipatory Search Warrant executed on February 26, 2021. [Doc. 98]. On January 17, 2024, the Government filed its Response, therein conceding to Defendant Hill's Motion. [Doc. 109]. Specifically, the Government states that the evidence obtained during the search at issue will not be used in its case-in-chief, but that the Government reserves the right to use such evidence in a manner not inconsistent with the exclusionary rule. [Id.]. As such, the Government requests that Defendant Hill's Motion to Suppress be dismissed as moot. [Id.]. On January 23, 2024, Defendant Hill filed her Reply, stating that she does not object to the Government's request to dismiss the motion as moot. [Doc. 111]. Accordingly, Defendant Hill's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 98] is unnecessary and therefore denied as moot.
On January 12, 2024, Defendant Hill filed a second Motion to Suppress concerning evidence obtained from a Search Warrant executed on October 16, 2020. [Doc. 108]. Defendant Hill's second Motion to Suppress remains pending at this time.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant Tina Jane Hill's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 98] is hereby DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.