Opinion
22-7439
05-31-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID HILL, Defendant-Appellant.
David Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: May 25, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1)
David Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
David Hill, a federal inmate, appeals the district court's order issuing a prefiling injunction in his criminal proceeding. Upon review of the record in conjunction with the arguments pressed on appeal, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in issuing the injunction. See Cromer v. Kraft Foods N. Am., Inc., 390 F.3d 812, 817-18 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review and providing four-factor test). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Hill, No. 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.