Opinion
21-6962
12-20-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DANIEL THOMAS HERSL, Defendant-Appellant.
Daniel Thomas Hersl, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: December 16, 2021
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cr-00106-CCB-3; 1:20-cv-03213-CCB)
Daniel Thomas Hersl, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Daniel Thomas Hersl seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motions (1) to rescind an extension of time granted to the Government to file a response, (2) to compel the U.S. Attorney to sign the Government's opposition, (3) to disqualify the Government's counsel, and (4) to appoint counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Hersl seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED