From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Herring

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 3, 1992
977 F.2d 1435 (11th Cir. 1992)

Summary

ordering that the cause shall be reheard en banc

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Hochman

Opinion

No. 90-7280.

November 3, 1992.

W. Terry Travis, George Beck, Dennis R. Pierson, Montgomery, Ala., for defendants-appellants.

James E. Wilson, U.S. Atty., Charles R. Niven, Asst. U.S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Truman M. Hobbs, Judge.

(Panel opinion June 17, 1991, 11th Cir., 1991, 933 F.2d 932)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, Circuit Judges.

Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Thomas a Clark has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).


A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

United States v. Herring

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 3, 1992
977 F.2d 1435 (11th Cir. 1992)

ordering that the cause shall be reheard en banc

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Hochman
Case details for

United States v. Herring

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. BENNIE DEAN HERRING…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Nov 3, 1992

Citations

977 F.2d 1435 (11th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Hochman

In contrast, the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. Herring, 933 F.2d 932 (11th Cir. 1991), and the Eighth…