From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez-Tinoco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
CR. No. S-11-351 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CR. No. S-11-351 GEB

01-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ-TINOCO, aka Gabriel Luna, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MICHELE BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

MICHELE BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

The parties request that the status conference in this case currently scheduled for January 20, 2012 be continued to February 3, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. They stipulate that the time between January 20, 2012 and February 3, 2012 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties are in the process of gathering additional facts relevant to sentencing and the anticipated resolution of this case. This continuance is necessary for further work by both parties on this and other pretrial and trial issues. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §(7)(B)(iv).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

_____________________

By: Michele Beckwith

Assistant U.S. Attorney

_____________________

DINA SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the status conference presently set for January 20, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. be continued to February 3, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. Based on the representations of counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time from the date of this Order, to and including, the February 3, 2012 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4.

____________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez-Tinoco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
CR. No. S-11-351 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez-Tinoco

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ-TINOCO, aka…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

CR. No. S-11-351 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)