From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez-Sarmiento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 27, 2012
Criminal Case No. 12-cr-00022-REB (D. Colo. Jan. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 12-cr-00022-REB

01-27-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ-SARMIENTO, 2. AGUSTIN AGUIRRE-RAMIREZ, 3. LUIS REYNOSO-RODRIGUEZ, 4. ADRIAN HERNANDEZ, and 5. HUMBERTO VILLALOBOS, Defendants.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER OF RECUSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me sua sponte. Because of my professional involvement in pre-indictment proceedings involving one or more of the defendants in this case, I must recuse.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), "[a]ny justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned." This section requires a judge to recuse himself when "a reasonable person, knowing all the facts, would harbor doubts about the judge's impartiality." Bryce v. Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Colorado, 289 F.3d 648, 659 (10th Cir. 2002) (citation omitted). Proof of actual bias is not necessary; recusal is required if the facts, from an objective perspective, admit of the appearance of bias. Id.; Salt Lake Tribune Publishing Co. v. AT & T Corp., 353 F.Supp.2d 1160, 1172 (D. Utah 2005).

Given these standards, it is clear to me that my further participation in these proceedings could well give rise to an objective appearance of bias; thus, warranting my sua sponte recusal and disqualification as required by 28 U.S.C. § 455 (a) and Canon 3.C(1) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, 175 F.R.D. 364, 368 (1998). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

This is not the type of conflict that the parties may waive. See 28 U.S.C. § 455(e). Nor is it one that may be excused if the judge already has invested "substantial time" in the matter. See id., § 455(f).

1. That the undersigned district judge is disqualified from presiding or acting further in this case; and

2. That this case shall be reassigned as provided by D.C.COLO.LCrR 50.1.

Dated January 27, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

__________________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez-Sarmiento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 27, 2012
Criminal Case No. 12-cr-00022-REB (D. Colo. Jan. 27, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez-Sarmiento

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ-SARMIENTO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 27, 2012

Citations

Criminal Case No. 12-cr-00022-REB (D. Colo. Jan. 27, 2012)