From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez-Medel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2012
CASE NO. 12CR2265-DMS (S.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12CR2265-DMS

07-31-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARACELY HERNANDEZ-MEDEL, Defendant.


JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that:

X an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or

____ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or

____ the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or

____ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or

____ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or

____ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty;

X of the offense(s) as charged in the Information:

21USC952 AND 960 - IMPORTATION OF METHAMPHETAMINE

THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged

_______________

NITA L. STORMES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez-Medel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2012
CASE NO. 12CR2265-DMS (S.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez-Medel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARACELY HERNANDEZ-MEDEL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 31, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 12CR2265-DMS (S.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2012)