From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez-Guzman

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 6, 2021
2:19-cr-48-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 6, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cr-48-SPC-NPM

08-06-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ISIDORO HERNANDEZ-GUZMAN


ORDER

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPALL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Under the Court's Administrative Order, No. 8:20-mc-25 (Doc. 1), which implements the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES”), the Court may conduct the sentencing hearing by video conferencing with Defendant ISIDORO HERNANDEZ-GUZMAN'S consent after he confers with counsel.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

(1) On or before October 22, 2021 at NOON, counsel for Defendant ISIDORO HERNANDEZ-GUZMAN must file a written notice advising the Court:

a. whether Defendant, after consulting with defense counsel, consents to proceed with the sentencing hearing by video conferencing and by telephone if video is not reasonably available;
b. why delaying the sentencing will result in serious harm to the interests of justice; and c. the Government's position on a videoconference sentencing hearing.

(2) If Defendant's counsel advises that Defendant consents to proceed with the hearing by video conferencing, the Clerk is DIRECTED to notice the hearing and provide all hearing participants with instructions for joining the hearing.

(3) The Court will address the specific findings required by the CARES Act at the video conference sentencing hearing.


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez-Guzman

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 6, 2021
2:19-cr-48-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 6, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez-Guzman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ISIDORO HERNANDEZ-GUZMAN

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Aug 6, 2021

Citations

2:19-cr-48-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 6, 2021)