From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez-Gonzalez

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Aug 9, 2017
Criminal Case No. 16-20669-CR-Scola (S.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2017)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 16-20669-CR-Scola

08-09-2017

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Luis Esnay Hernandez-Gonzalez, Defendant.


Order Adopting Magistrate's Report And Recommendation

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for a report and recommendation on the Defendant's motion to release some seized assets (ECF No. 65). On June 26, 2017, Judge Torres issued a report, recommending that the Court deny the motion. (Report & Recommendations, ECF No. 96.) The Defendant Luis Hernandez-Gonzalez objected (ECF No. 107), and the Government responded (ECF No. 113). Having considered Judge Torres's report, the record, and the relevant legal authorities, this Court finds Judge Torres's report and recommendation cogent and compelling.

The Court affirms and adopts Judge Torres's report and recommendation (ECF No. 96). The Court denies without prejudice Hernandez-Gonzalez's motion to release some seized assets (ECF No. 65). However, the Court will allow Hernandez-Gonzalez to file an amended motion including the financial affidavits. The motion "should be highly detailed and address all of the . . . points described" in Judge Torres's report. (Report at 17.)

Done and Ordered at Miami, Florida, on August 9, 2017.

/s/_________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez-Gonzalez

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Aug 9, 2017
Criminal Case No. 16-20669-CR-Scola (S.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez-Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Luis Esnay Hernandez-Gonzalez…

Court:United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Date published: Aug 9, 2017

Citations

Criminal Case No. 16-20669-CR-Scola (S.D. Fla. Aug. 9, 2017)

Citing Cases

United States v. $89,866.18

s necessary under Farmer are no longer required, nor has she cited any other authority subsequent to Luis…

In re Search of One Address in Wash., D.C., Under Rule 41

Regardless, Eighth Amendment challenges are not ripe until forfeiture is imposed after a finding of guilt.…