From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 17, 2011
No. CR-11-00494 DLJ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR-11-00494 DLJ

11-17-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOB HERNANDEZ, Defendant.

BARRY J. PORTMAN Federal Public Defender MANUEL U. ARAUJO Counsel for Defendant JOB HERNANDEZ


BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

MANUEL U. ARAUJO

Counsel for Defendant JOB HERNANDEZ

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING TO NOVEMBER 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., and [PROPOSED] ORDER

Honorable Howard R. Lloyd

STIPULATION

The parties, Job Hernandez and the government, acting through their respective counsel and subject to the Court's approval, stipulate that the hearing date currently set for November 18, 2011, be vacated and that the Court set a new hearing date on November 22, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.

Counsel for Mr. Hernandez has a calendar conflict and will be unavailable on November 18, 2011.

The parties further agree and stipulate for purposes of Speedy Trial Act computations pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) that time should be excluded from November 18, 2011 through and including November 22, 2011, to provide continuity of counsel and to provide defense counsel further time to prepare. Accordingly, Mr. Hernandez and the government agree that granting the requested exclusion of time will serve the interest of justice and outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Manuel U. Araujo,

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Thomas Colthurst,

Assistant United States Attorney

[PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREFORE, based on the above, the COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the hearing currently scheduled on November 18, 2011, is continued to November 22, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., and further ordered that the period of delay from time from November 18, 2011, through and including November 22, 2011, is excluded for purposes of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

SO ORDERED.

HONORABLE, HOWARD R. LLOYD,

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 17, 2011
No. CR-11-00494 DLJ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOB HERNANDEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

No. CR-11-00494 DLJ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)