From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 8, 2011
No. 2:11-cr-214 JAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cr-214 JAM

08-08-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ANTHONY HERNANDEZ, JESUS RODRIGUEZ GARIBAY Defendants.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender JEFFREY L. STANIELS, Bar #91413 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant MICHAEL ANTHONY HERNANDEZ


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

JEFFREY L. STANIELS, Bar #91413

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

MICHAEL ANTHONY HERNANDEZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE

Date: August 9, 2011

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Judge: John A. Mendez

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Jason S. Hitt, counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey L. Staniels, counsel for defendant, MICHAEL ANTHONY HERNANDEZ, that the status conference now set for August 9, 2011, be vacated and the matter continued to September 20, 2011, to allow further time for defense preparation and consultation concerning possible terms of resolution of these charges without trial.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that a continuance is reasonably necessary given the current state of defense preparation which is diligently proceeding apace and given the availability of government and defense counsel during this intervening period, and that the time from August 9, 2011, through September 20, 2011, therefore should be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 et. seq., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Jason S. Hitt

Assistant United States Attorney

Counsel for Plaintiff

Jeffrey L. Staniels

Assistant Federal Defender

Counsel for Defendant

MICHAEL ANTHONY HERNANDEZ

Counsel for Defendant

JESUS RODRIGUEZ GARIBAY

ORDER

Based on the representations of counsel the court finds that the requested continuance is appropriate and that the interests of the government and the defense in granting this continuance outweigh the interests of the defendants and the public in a speedy trial. The requested continuance is therefore GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By the Court,

Hon. John A. Mendez

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 8, 2011
No. 2:11-cr-214 JAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ANTHONY HERNANDEZ, JESUS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 8, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cr-214 JAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)