From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2011
No. CR-S 11-0097 KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR-S 11-0097 KJM

10-25-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARIA HERNANDEZ, COSME RODRIGUEZ Defendant.

DINA L. SANTOS Attorney for Maria Hernandez RANDALL ENSMINGER Attorney for Cosme Rodriguez DANIEL MCCONKIE Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DINA L. SANTOS, Bar #204200

Attorney at Law

Attorney for Defendant

MARIA HERNANDEZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING DATE, CONTINUING CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME


Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Daniel McConkie, Counsel for Plaintiff, Attorney Dina L. Santos, Counsel for Defendant Maria Hernandez; and Attorney Randall Ensminger, Counsel for Cosme Rodriguez, that the status conference scheduled for September 1, 20011 be vacated and the matter be continued to this Court's criminal calendar on Dec. 15, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. for further status and possible change of plea

This continuance is requested by the defense in order to permit counsel to conduct investigation, review discovery, and continue in negotiations with the prosecution in attempt to finalize a plea agreement. The Government has recently provided draft plea agreements to both Defendant's, and both Counsel need time to review the drafts with their respective clients and negotiate any changes.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et. seq. be tolled pursuant to § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv), Local code T-4 (time to prepare), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendant further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court is advised that all counsel have conferred about this request, that they have agreed to the December 15, 2011, date, and that all Counsel have authorized Ms. Santos to sign this stipulation on their behalf.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DINA L. SANTOS

Attorney for

Maria Hernandez

RANDALL ENSMINGER

Attorney for

Cosme Rodriguez

DANIEL MCCONKIE

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

The court finds excludable time through December 15, 2011, based on Local Code T4, giving counsel reasonable time to prepare, and finds that the ends of justice served by excluding time outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2011
No. CR-S 11-0097 KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARIA HERNANDEZ, COSME RODRIGUEZ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

No. CR-S 11-0097 KJM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)