From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez

United States District Court, District of South Dakota
Oct 27, 2022
1:22-CR-10016-CBK (D.S.D. Oct. 27, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-CR-10016-CBK

10-27-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RIGOBERTO HERNANDEZ, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CHARLES B. KORNMANN, United States District Judge

Defendant filed a motion to suppress all statements made and all evidence seized by law enforcement arising out of a traffic stop on January 21, 2021. The motion came on for hearing before the Honorable Mark A. Moreno, U.S. Magistrate Judge, on October 6, 2022. Magistrate Moreno issued a report and recommendation on October 22, 2022, recommending that the motion to suppress be granted. Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, objections, if any were required to be filed within three business days of the issuance of the report and recommendation. The government filed late objections after the close of business on the third business day. Such objections will not be considered. I have conducted a review of the record and files herein.

Now, therefore, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation, Doc. 55, is adopted.
2. Defendant's motion, Doc. 29, to suppress is granted.


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez

United States District Court, District of South Dakota
Oct 27, 2022
1:22-CR-10016-CBK (D.S.D. Oct. 27, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RIGOBERTO HERNANDEZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of South Dakota

Date published: Oct 27, 2022

Citations

1:22-CR-10016-CBK (D.S.D. Oct. 27, 2022)

Citing Cases

United States v. Witt

It found that the windshield statute does require that the defect “significantly impair” the view of the…