From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jun 30, 2022
CR-20-02117-001-TUC-RM (MSA) (D. Ariz. Jun. 30, 2022)

Opinion

CR-20-02117-001-TUC-RM (MSA)

06-30-2022

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Roy Diego Hernandez, Defendant.


ORDER

Honorable Rosemary Marquez, United States District Judge

On April 28, 2022, Magistrate Judge Maria S. Aguilera issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 55) recommending that this Court deny Defendant Roy Diego Hernandez's Motion to Suppress (Doc. 45). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed.

A district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions” of a magistrate judge's “report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(3) (“The district judge must consider de novo any objection to the magistrate judge's recommendation”). Failure to object to the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge “waives a party's right to review.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2).

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Aguilera's Report and Recommendation, the parties' briefs, and the record. The Court finds no error in Magistrate Judge Aguilera's Report and Recommendation, and Defendant has waived his right to review by failing to file objections.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 55) is accepted and adopted in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. 45) is denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Jun 30, 2022
CR-20-02117-001-TUC-RM (MSA) (D. Ariz. Jun. 30, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Roy Diego Hernandez, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Jun 30, 2022

Citations

CR-20-02117-001-TUC-RM (MSA) (D. Ariz. Jun. 30, 2022)