From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cr-0026 GEB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cr-0026 GEB

10-28-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AMADO N. HERNANDEZ, Defendant.

Respectfully submitted, DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender TIMOTHY ZINDEL Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Amado Hernandez BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney RUSSELL CARLBERG Assistant U.S. Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

AMADO N. HERNANDEZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING


Judge: Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant, Amado N. Hernandez, that the status conference scheduled for October 28, 2011, may be continued to November 18, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.

Defense counsel recently returned from extended leave and needs time to review the results of forensic testing done on materials seized from Mr. Hernandez and others. Accordingly, the parties agree that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and that time under the Speedy Trial Act may be excluded from the date of this order through November 18, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Amado Hernandez

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

RUSSELL CARLBERG

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The status conference is continued to November 18, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through November 18, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cr-0026 GEB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AMADO N. HERNANDEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cr-0026 GEB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)