From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hernandez

United States District Court, D. Maryland.
Oct 5, 2017
265 F. Supp. 3d 639 (D. Md. 2017)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. JKB–16–0259

10-05-2017

UNITED STATES of America v. Elvin Ulises DIAZ HERNANDEZ, et al., Defendants

Kenneth Sutherland Clark, Clinton Jacob Fuchs, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, Catherine Kuo Dick, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for United States of America Harry J. Trainor, Jr., Trainor Billman Bennett and Milko LLP, Annapolis, MD, Richard C. Bittner, Law Office of Richard C. Bittner, Glen Burnie, MD, Teresa Whalen, Law Office of Teresa Whalen, Silver Spring, MD, Anthony Douglas Martin, Anthony D. Martin PC, Greenbelt, MD, William B. Purpura, Jr., Law Office of William B. Purpura, Baltimore, MD, for Defendants.


Kenneth Sutherland Clark, Clinton Jacob Fuchs, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, Catherine Kuo Dick, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for United States of America

Harry J. Trainor, Jr., Trainor Billman Bennett and Milko LLP, Annapolis, MD, Richard C. Bittner, Law Office of Richard C. Bittner, Glen Burnie, MD, Teresa Whalen, Law Office of Teresa Whalen, Silver Spring, MD, Anthony Douglas Martin, Anthony D. Martin PC, Greenbelt, MD, William B. Purpura, Jr., Law Office of William B. Purpura, Baltimore, MD, for Defendants.

ORDER

James K. Bredar, United States District Judge

Pending before the Court is the Government's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 96.) The Court has considered it and Defendant Elvin Diaz–Hernandez's opposition (ECF No. 97). The Court will grant the motion to extend the deadline from October 6, 2017, until November 6, 2017, for the Government to provide notice of its intention to seek the death penalty pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3593(a) (requiring Government to file death-penalty notice "a reasonable time before the trial"). The Court has the inherent authority to set such a deadline and to enforce it, as it will surely do in this case. See United States v. Slone , 969 F.Supp.2d 830, 838 (E.D. Ky. 2013) (court has authority to set deadline for notice); United States v. Tsarnaev , Crim. No. 13-10200-GAO, 2013 WL 5701582, at *2 (D. Mass. Oct. 18, 2013) (same).

The trial in this case is set to begin March 26, 2018 (Am. Sched. Order, ECF No. 89), which is 140 days after the new, extended deadline. In the Court's judgment, any time less than that is insufficient for the Defendants to prepare for trial of a case in which the death penalty is at issue. Consequently, the Court has no intention to further extend this important deadline.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Government's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (ECF No. 96) IS GRANTED and the Government SHALL FILE its notice of intention to seek the death penalty in this case no later than November 6, 2017.


Summaries of

United States v. Hernandez

United States District Court, D. Maryland.
Oct 5, 2017
265 F. Supp. 3d 639 (D. Md. 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America v. Elvin Ulises DIAZ HERNANDEZ, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Maryland.

Date published: Oct 5, 2017

Citations

265 F. Supp. 3d 639 (D. Md. 2017)

Citing Cases

United States v. Yandell

The Ninth Circuit and Supreme Court have not decided specifically whether federal district courts may set and…