Opinion
CRIMINAL 2:20-CR-00888
09-08-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DYLAN HENRY
ORDER
DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pending before the Court is Defendant Dylan Henry's letter motion to reconsider the Court's August 10, 2022 Memorandum Opinion & Order denying his Motion to Correct Sentence 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). (Dkt. No. 33). The Court denied the motion because Defendant had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), and he still has offered no evidence that he attempted to exhaust his administrative remedies before moving the Court to reduce his sentence. Because he has failed to comply with the exhaustion requirements under Section 3582, his motion is not ripe for review. And the Court is without jurisdiction to grant it.
Accordingly, Defendant's letter motion to reconsider a sentence reduction (Dkt. No. 33) is DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.