From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Henricy

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jan 29, 2016
633 F. App'x 783 (11th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-13226

01-29-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SAM HENRICY, a.k.a. Tukan, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 9:14-cr-80227-KLR-2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Frederick Charles Hutchinson, III, appointed counsel for Sam Henricy in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Henricy's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Henricy

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jan 29, 2016
633 F. App'x 783 (11th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Henricy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SAM HENRICY, a.k.a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 29, 2016

Citations

633 F. App'x 783 (11th Cir. 2016)