From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Heney

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Jun 14, 2022
1:21-cr-20085-01 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 14, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cr-20085-01

06-14-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KYLE ROBERT HENEY, Defendant.


Honorable Patricia T. Morris, United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING GUILTY PLEA, AND TAKING RULE 11 PLEA AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea hearing upon Defendant Kyle Robert Heney's consent. ECF No. 33. On May 23, 2022, Judge Morris issued her Report and Recommendation, recommending that this Court accept Defendant's guilty plea. ECF No. 35.

Although the Report states that the parties may object to and seek review of the recommendations within 14 days of service, neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. Therefore, they have waived their right to appeal Judge Morris's findings that Defendant was competent to enter a plea and that the plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, without coercion, and with a basis in fact. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Judge Morris's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 35, is ADOPTED.

Further, it is ORDERED that Defendant's guilty plea is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement, ECF No. 33, is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.


Summaries of

United States v. Heney

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Jun 14, 2022
1:21-cr-20085-01 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 14, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Heney

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KYLE ROBERT HENEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Jun 14, 2022

Citations

1:21-cr-20085-01 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 14, 2022)