From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hendrix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 20, 2011
CASE NO. 1:08-CR-00232 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:08-CR-00232 LJO

10-20-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CURTIS HENDRIX, Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KIMBERLY A. SANCHEZ Assistant U.S. Attorney JON RENGE Attorney for Curtis Hendrix


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

KIMBERLY A. SANCHEZ

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

CONTINUANCE OF STATUS

CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Benjamin B. Wagner, United States Attorney and Kimberly A. Sanchez, Assistant U.S. Attorney and Jon Renge, attorney for Curtis Hendrix, that hearing currently set for October 21, 2011 and related motions schedule be vacated. The parties further request that the trial set for November 7, 2011 be continued to Tuesday, March 13, 2012. Upon closer inspection of discovery in preparation for trial, the defendant is considering filing additional motions that require additional investigation, and is reconsidering entering into a negotiated plea agreement with the government. Moreover, based upon medical reasons set forth by the government in camera to the Court and defense counsel, the government is also requesting that the trial be continued. The parties have consulted regarding the amount of additional time necessary based upon the above reasons as well as to insure continuity of counsel for the defendant. The parties further request the Court to enter an Order finding that the "ends of justice" served by a continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that the delay occasioned by such continuance is excluded from the Act's time limits pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

KIMBERLY A. SANCHEZ

Assistant U.S. Attorney

JON RENGE

Attorney for Curtis Hendrix
Good Cause is present, both for the continuance and the exclusion of time. The requests are granted. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hendrix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 20, 2011
CASE NO. 1:08-CR-00232 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Hendrix

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CURTIS HENDRIX, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:08-CR-00232 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)