From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hendrix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 7, 2012
CR No.: 3:06-61-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2012)

Opinion

CR No.: 3:06-61-JFA

02-07-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEROME HENDRIX


ORDER

Upon motion of the defendant under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's motion (ECF No. 1204) is DENIED. The defendant was sentenced to the statutory mandatory minimum sentence of 240 months imprisonment for his conviction relating to crack cocaine. While the defendant was afforded relief under Rule 35(b) for a new sentence of 135 months, any possible reductions under Amendment 750 result in the same guideline range for the defendant. Therefore, as Amendment 750 did not lower defendant's guideline range, it does not apply and any guideline changes cannot alter the ultimate statutory floor of 20 years imprisonment set by Congress.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 7, 2012

Columbia, South Carolina

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hendrix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 7, 2012
CR No.: 3:06-61-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hendrix

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEROME HENDRIX

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Feb 7, 2012

Citations

CR No.: 3:06-61-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2012)