From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hendrick

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jun 23, 1965
347 F.2d 349 (3d Cir. 1965)

Opinion

No. 15128.

Argued May 6, 1965.

Decided June 23, 1965.

Charles H. Frey, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens Young, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Gordon Gelfond, Asst. Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee (Joseph M. Smith, Asst. Dist. Atty., Chief, Appeals Div., F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Jr., First Asst. Dist. Atty., James C. Crumlish, Jr., Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief).

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.


In this petition of a Pennsylvania prisoner for a writ of habeas corpus it is contended that opportunity to appeal the original convictions in the state courts was abridged by the refusal of the state to provide counsel for the accused. The district court dismissed the petition because this contention had not at any time been submitted to a state court.

On this appeal counsel for the state has represented that the state will cooperate in the obtaining of a full and speedy hearing in the state courts on the merits of the petitioner's contentions.

In these circumstances, we think it will best serve all interests here involved to direct that the district court vacate its order dismissing this petition and stay further proceedings in this case until the petitioner shall have had an opportunity to present the question of denial of counsel to an appropriate state court.

The judgment will be vacated and the cause remanded for disposition in accordance with this opinion.


Summaries of

United States v. Hendrick

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jun 23, 1965
347 F.2d 349 (3d Cir. 1965)
Case details for

United States v. Hendrick

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Noah Willis ALTIZER, Appellant, v. Edward…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jun 23, 1965

Citations

347 F.2d 349 (3d Cir. 1965)

Citing Cases

United States v. Rundle

For this reason, this court is without jurisdiction to rule on this aspect of relator's petition. United…

United States v. Banmiller

We deem it unnecessary to direct the court below to retain jurisdiction pending application by the relator to…