Opinion
CIVIL 21-3821 22-4181 CRIMINAL 17-606-1
08-07-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NASHADEEM HENDERSON
ORDER
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
AND NOW, this 7th day of August 2024, upon consideration of the pending motions and the responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's Motion for Release of Documents and Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. No. 231] is DISMISSED as moot.
2. Defendant's first Motion to Vacate under § 2255 [Doc. No. 238], second Motion to Vacate under § 2255 [Doc. No. 263], and third Motion to Vacate under § 2255 [Doc. No. 264], Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Counts One, Two, Three and Five [Doc. No. 275], Defendant's Motion for Reduction of Sentence [Doc. No. 276] are DENIED.
3. A certificate of appealability will not issue as there is no basis for concluding that “reasonable jurists could debate whether . . . the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further;”
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the cases.
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (internal citation and quotation omitted).
It is so ORDERED.