From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Henderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2021
Case No. 14-cr-00307-BAS-1 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 14-cr-00307-BAS-1

01-27-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIELLE LASHEA HENDERSON, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO FIRST STEP ACT (ECF No. 70)

On November 23, 2020, in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, this Court sentenced Ms. Henderson to six months in custody for violating her supervised release. (ECF No. 69.) Less than two months later, she moves to reduce her sentence pursuant to the First Step Act, arguing that her asthma and obesity make her risk greater if she were to contract COVID-19. (ECF No. 70 ("Defendant's Motion").) The Government opposes the Motion. (ECF No. 72 ("Government's Response").) Defendant replies. (ECF No. 73.) For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the Motion.

ANALYSIS

A district court generally "may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed." 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c); see also Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 825-26 (2010). A narrow exception, compassionate release, allows a court to reduce a sentence for "extraordinary and compelling reasons." 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

The only factors that have changed since Ms. Henderson was sentenced on November 23, 2020, are that: (1) Ms. Henderson tested positive for COVID-19 on December 9, 2020 (Defendant's Motion, Exhs. A, G); and (2) on December 30, 2020, and January 20, 2021, Ms. Henderson received both doses of the Pfizer vaccine protecting against future COVID-19 infection (Government's Response, Appendix A).

Ms. Henderson provides evidence that she suffers from asthma and is morbidly obese. Thus, she argues she is at enhanced risk of serious illness or death were she to get reinfected or relapse with the coronavirus. However, her chances of reinfection or relapse have been largely dissipated by her vaccination. See CDC, Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/facts.html (last updated Jan. 20, 2021) (providing COVID-19 vaccination will protect an individual from getting sick with COVID-19 in the future).

Therefore, the Court finds Ms. Henderson has failed to show "extraordinary and compelling reasons" for her release.

CONCLUSION

Because Ms. Henderson has been vaccinated for COVID-19, the Court finds she fails to show extraordinary and compelling reasons for her request to be released. Therefore, her Motion to Reduce her sentence (ECF No. 70) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 27, 2021

/s/ _________

Hon. Cynthia Bashant

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Henderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2021
Case No. 14-cr-00307-BAS-1 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIELLE LASHEA HENDERSON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 27, 2021

Citations

Case No. 14-cr-00307-BAS-1 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2021)

Citing Cases

United States v. Wajda

Many courts have found that a vaccinated prisoner's risk of contracting COVID-19 does not rise to the level…

United States v. Martinez

However, the Court agrees with other district courts that Defendant's "vaccination significantly mitigates…