From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 1, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11-CR-079 (AWI) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-CR-079 (AWI)

09-01-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SUONG HEM, Defendant.

YASIN MOHAMMAD Assistant U.S. Attorney VICTOR CHAVEZ Attorney for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

YASIN MOHAMMAD

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

MOTIONS HEARING; ORDER THEREON

DATE: October 24, 2011

TIME: 9:00 a.m.

JUDGE: Hon.

On August 22, 2011, with the parties' agreement, the Court ordered that motions in this case be heard on October 17, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. Just recently, however, the government attorney on this case was informed that he has been accepted to a course at the National Advocacy Center, for which he will be out of town on the hearing date. The government has conferred with defense counsel in the matter, and has determined that October 24, 2011 would be an acceptable alternate hearing date.

The parties, therefore, stipulate and request that the motions hearing in this matter be continued to October 24, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., with time excluded from now until the disposition of all motions, on the bases that motions will be under advisement, and that the ends of justice accomplished by allowing time for briefing and for all parties to be present at the motions hearing, outweigh the defendant's and public's interest in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(H)(1)(D), 3161(H)(7)(A) (2011).

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

YASIN MOHAMMAD

Assistant U.S. Attorney

VICTOR CHAVEZ

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT that the motions hearing in this matter be continued to October 24, 2011 at 9:00 a.m., with time excluded from now until the disposition of all motions, on the bases that motions will be under advisement, and that the ends of justice accomplished by allowing time for briefing, and for all parties to be present at the motions hearing, outweigh the defendant's and public's interest in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(H)(1)(D), 3161(H)(7)(A) (2011).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 1, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11-CR-079 (AWI) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Hem

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SUONG HEM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-CR-079 (AWI) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)