From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hayden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 9, 2011
No. 1:11-cr-00038 LJO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:11-cr-00038 LJO

08-09-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DEMOND JAMES HAYDEN, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney ELANA S. LANDAU Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender CHARLES J. LEE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant DEMOND JAMES HAYDEN


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

CHARLES J. LEE, Bar #221057

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

DEMOND JAMES HAYDEN

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that the sentencing hearing in the above-captioned matter now set for August 19, 2011, may be continued to September 23, 2011 at 9:00 A.M.

This continuance is at the request of defense counsel to allow time for proper preparation of the sentencing hearing. Based on the presentence investigation report by the probation department, defense feels it is necessary to acquire certain court documents relating to Mr. Hayden's prior convictions. Additionally, because Mr. Hayden has been housed at the Lerdo facility, reviewing documents and meeting with the client has been more difficult. If the court were to grant defense's requested continuance, defense is confident it would have all necessary investigation completed and its sentencing memorandum filed in a timely fashion as well by the requested date.

Because this is a sentencing hearing, no exclusion of time is necessary under the Speedy Trial Act.

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

ELANA S. LANDAU

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

CHARLES J. LEE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

DEMOND JAMES HAYDEN

ORDER

Good Cause exists as stated in the stipulation. The request is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hayden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 9, 2011
No. 1:11-cr-00038 LJO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Hayden

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DEMOND JAMES HAYDEN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 9, 2011

Citations

No. 1:11-cr-00038 LJO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)