From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hayat

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 26, 2015
2:05-cr-00240-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2015)

Opinion


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. HAMID HAYAT, Movant. Nos. 2:05-cr-00240-GEB-CMK United States District Court, E.D. California. March 26, 2015

          ORDER

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         On March 2, 2015, Movant Hamid Hayat filed a motion seeking "an order appointing Dennis P. Riordan and the firm of Riordan and Horgan as Mr. Hayat's counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3006A, with such appointment to be made nunc pro tunc to June 20, 2013." (Not. Mot. Appointment of Counsel 1:17-20, ECF No. 563.) However, on March 23, 2015, Magistrate Judge Kellison issued an order granting Movant's earlier request for appointment of counsel "nunc pro tunc to June 20, 2013." (Order 2:15-17, ECF No. 566.) Therefore, the motion for appointment of counsel, which is scheduled for hearing before the undersigned judge on March 30, 2015, is moot, and the hearing on said motion is vacated.


Summaries of

United States v. Hayat

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 26, 2015
2:05-cr-00240-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Hayat

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. HAMID HAYAT, Movant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 26, 2015

Citations

2:05-cr-00240-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2015)