From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hawkins

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Jul 6, 2018
No. 17-11017 (5th Cir. Jul. 6, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-11017

07-06-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. KEDRICK CORTEZ HAWKINS, Defendant-Appellant


Conference Calendar Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:16-CR-78-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

The attorney appointed to represent Kedrick Cortez Hawkins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hawkins has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hawkins's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


Summaries of

United States v. Hawkins

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Jul 6, 2018
No. 17-11017 (5th Cir. Jul. 6, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Hawkins

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. KEDRICK CORTEZ HAWKINS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 6, 2018

Citations

No. 17-11017 (5th Cir. Jul. 6, 2018)

Citing Cases

Hawkins v. United States

On direct appeal, appellate counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and the…