From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hawk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION
Jun 8, 2020
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1:19-cr-00033-MR-WCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Jun. 8, 2020)

Opinion

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1:19-cr-00033-MR-WCM-1

06-08-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TEVIN DEVON HAWK, Defendant.


ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's letter, which the Court construes as a motion for release to home confinement [Doc. 57].

The Defendant moves the Court to order his release to home confinement due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. [Doc. 496].

The discretion to release a prisoner to home confinement lies solely with the Attorney General. See 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(2); 34 U.S.C. § 60541(g). The legislation recently passed by Congress to address the COVID-19 pandemic does not alter this. See CARES Act, Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat 281, 516 (2020) ("During the covered emergency period, if the Attorney General finds that emergency conditions will materially affect the functioning of the Bureau [of Prisons], the Director of the Bureau may lengthen the maximum amount of time for which the Director is authorized to place a prisoner in home confinement under the first sentence of section 3624(c)(2) of title 18, United States Code, as the Director determines appropriate.") (emphasis added). As such, this Court lacks the authority to order the Defendant's release. Deffenbaugh v. Sullivan, No. 5:19-HC-2049-FL, 2019 WL 1779573, at *1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 2019); United States v. Overcash, No. 3:15-CR-263-FDW-1, 2019 WL 1472104, at *3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2019) (noting that there is "no provision for judicial review of the BOP's and Attorney General's decision with regards to a request for home detention under § 60541(g)"); United States v. Curry, No. 6:06-082-DCR, 2019 WL 508067, at *1 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 8, 2019) ("Because the First Step Act gives the Attorney General the discretion to determine if and when home confinement is appropriate, this Court does not have the authority to grant the requested relief.") (emphasis in original).

For these reasons, the Defendant's request for a release to home detention is denied.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's letter, which the Court construes as a motion for release to home confinement [Doc. 57], is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed: June 8, 2020

/s/_________

Martin Reidinger

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Hawk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION
Jun 8, 2020
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1:19-cr-00033-MR-WCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Jun. 8, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Hawk

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TEVIN DEVON HAWK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 8, 2020

Citations

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1:19-cr-00033-MR-WCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Jun. 8, 2020)