Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

United States v. Harrison

683 F. Supp. 3d 184 (N.D.N.Y. 2023)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
United States v. Harrison

5 Citing cases

  1. United States v. Sternquist

    692 F. Supp. 3d 19 (E.D.N.Y. 2023)   Cited 8 times
    Upholding § 922(g) both on its face and as applied, and reasoning that "Bruen did not disturb and, if anything, endorsed prior Supreme Court dicta assuring the validity of 'longstanding prohibitions' of felon firearm possession"

    Significantly, as the Government notes here, Bogle did not apply the "means-end interest balancing" analysis rejected by Bruen in affirming § 922(g)(1)'s constitutionality. See, Opp. at 9; Hampton, 676 F.Supp.3d at 300-01; United States v. Harrison, 683 F.Supp.3d 184, 195 (N.D.N.Y. July 20, 2023)(concurring with Hampton). Instead, "the Second Circuit reasoned purely from language in Heller and McDonald expressly affirming 'longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons.' "

  2. United States v. Roberts

    710 F. Supp. 3d 658 (D. Alaska 2024)   Cited 23 times
    Distinguishing Range's three-year probation sentence from the defendant's two-and-a-half-year imprisonment

    Range, 69 F.4th at 113 (J. Ambro, concurring).See United States v. Harrison, No. 3:22-CR-455, 683 F.Supp.3d 184, 195 (N.D.N.Y. July 20, 2023) (comparing Range, "the food stamp fraudster who pleaded guilty to an unusual state law misdemeanor," to the defendant, whose "prior misconduct involve[d] an actual federal felony: his ... federal drug conviction").Range, 69 F.4th at 106.

  3. Williams v. City of Syracuse

    5:22-CV-0067 (GTS/MJK) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2025)

    Walczyk, 496 F.3d at 156 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 [1983]). An individual may challenge the validity of a search warrant where “the affidavit supporting the warrant application contains deliberately or recklessly false or misleading information or material omissions of fact.” United States v. Harrison, 683 F.Supp.3d 184, 203 (N.D.N.Y. 2023) (Hurd, J.) (citing United States v. McKenzie, 13 F.4th 223, 236 [2d Cir. 2021]).

  4. Virgil v. Finn

    22 Civ. 3169 (CS)(JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2025)

    While the DOCCS Defendants have not described the security concern with specificity, the Court finds merit in the DOCCS Defendants' concerns. While one court in this Circuit has previously granted leave to file bodycam footage under seal, see United States v. Harrison, 683 F.Supp.3d 184, 188, n.1 (N.D.N.Y. 2023), another court in this Circuit denied requests to seal body-worn camera videos where defendants' arguments were “conclusory and unavailing,” Preston v. City of Rochester, 6:22-CV-06525 EAW, 2024 WL 4266528, at *3 (W.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2024). Here, the videos depict the internal layout of the prison and show several officers and inmates who are not parties to the action, thus, posing a risk to the safety and security of the prisons.

  5. United States v. Coleman

    698 F. Supp. 3d 851 (E.D. Va. 2023)   Cited 22 times
    Rejecting Government's contention that determination of whether individual was part of "the people" protected by Second Amendment should be vested with legislatures because "hold[ing] otherwise would permit Congress and state legislatures to de facto amend the Constitution themselves, thus circumventing the Constitution's amendment process by legislative fiat. Neither Heller nor Bruen countenances such a malleable scope of the Second Amendment's protections."

    15. United States v. Deare, No. 6:21-cr-212, 2023 WL 4732568 (W.D. La. July 24, 2023); 16. United States v. Gilbert, No. 21-cr-110, 2023 WL 4708005 (S.D. Ala. July 24, 2023); 17. United States v. Harrison, No. 3:22-cr-455, 683 F.Supp.3d 184 (N.D.N.Y. July 20, 2023); 18. United States v. Faust, No. 23-cr-2005, 2023 WL 4626672 (N.D. Iowa July 19, 2023); 19.