From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Harriot

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 4, 2013
539 F. App'x 154 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-7022

09-04-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith, Defendant - Appellant.

Michael Owen Harriot, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00341-SB-3) Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Owen Harriot, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Harriot appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court denied the motion because the Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 750 did not result in a change to the Guidelines range. We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument will not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Harriot

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 4, 2013
539 F. App'x 154 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Harriot

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 4, 2013

Citations

539 F. App'x 154 (4th Cir. 2013)