From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Harrington

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 23, 2023
2:23-mj-01010-JBC (D.N.J. Feb. 23, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-mj-01010-JBC

02-23-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VAN HARRINGTON


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCINC/TELECONFERENCING

Honorable Andre M. Espinosa United States Magistrate Judge

In accordance with the operative CO VID-19 Standing Orders, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) lias consented to the use of video tdeconferendng/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained ata facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[ ] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Harrington

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 23, 2023
2:23-mj-01010-JBC (D.N.J. Feb. 23, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VAN HARRINGTON

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Feb 23, 2023

Citations

2:23-mj-01010-JBC (D.N.J. Feb. 23, 2023)