From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Harper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Apr 8, 2015
Case No. 3:02-CR-081 JD (N.D. Ind. Apr. 8, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:02-CR-081 JD

04-08-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CLAUDE HARPER


OPINION AND ORDER

Now before the Court is the Defendant Claude Harper's request for counsel to assist him in filing a motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. [DE 72]. The Court previously requested the United States Probation Office to prepare a Sentence Reduction Addendum, which it did, and the government has responded in opposition to any reduction. [DE 74, 76]. Mr. Harper has moved for a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2) on three previous occasions. Each of the previous motions was denied because, although the offense levels relative to crack cocaine have been retroactively reduced several times, Mr. Harper's Guidelines range was actually determined by his status as a career offender and not the type or quantity of drugs for which he was responsible. Mr. Harper was represented by counsel relative to those previous motions, and in each instance, counsel agreed that Mr. Harper was not entitled to any reduction.

For those same reasons, Mr. Harper is not eligible for a reduction under Amendment 782, either. Amendment 782 reduces the base offense levels of the drug quantity table under § 2D1.1 of the Guidelines, but Mr. Harper's Guidelines range was determined by § 4B1.1, not § 2D1.1. Accordingly, his offense level has not been lowered by the Sentencing Commission, as is required under § 3582(c)(2), and Mr. Harper is not eligible for a reduction. Because the Court has appointed counsel for Mr. Harper on multiple previous occasions, and because the Court has explained in detail on each of those occasions why Mr. Harper was not entitled to any reduction, appointing counsel relative to this most recent request cannot be justified. Therefore, the Court DENIES Mr. Harper's request for counsel, and to the extent Mr. Harper's request was also meant as a motion for a reduction under § 3582(c)(2), DENIES that motion as well.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: April 8, 2015

/s/ JON E. DEGUILIO

Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Harper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Apr 8, 2015
Case No. 3:02-CR-081 JD (N.D. Ind. Apr. 8, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Harper

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CLAUDE HARPER

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Date published: Apr 8, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:02-CR-081 JD (N.D. Ind. Apr. 8, 2015)