From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Haroun

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 16, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-CR-260-JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-CR-260-JAM

09-16-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JACK HAROUN Defendant

ALEX R. KESSEL Attorney for Defendant Jack Haroun BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney STEVEN LAPHAM Assistant United States Attorney


ALEX R. KESSEL (State Bar No. 110715)

Attorney for Claimant

JACK HAROUN

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

DATE: November 8, 2011

TIME: 9:30 AM

COURT: Courtroom 6

IT IS HEREBY stipulated between Defendant Jack Haroun, by and through his attorney, Alex R. Kessel and the United States of America, by and though its attorney, Assistant U.S. Attorney Steven Lapham, that the status conference be set in this matter for November 8, 2011, 9:30.m. in Courtroom 6.

Defense counsel will be engaged in trial September 20, 2011 on the matter of People vs. Beverly Beverly, case number MA051039, in Department A-21 of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Michael Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse. This is a one defendant Assault with a deadly weapon case wherein the defendant is out of custody.

Beginning October 11, 2011, defense counsel will be engaged in trial on the matter of People vs. Randy Harp, Case Number BA358363, in Department 133 of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center. This is a three defendant case sale of a controlled substance, possession for sale of a controlled substance, transportation of a controlled substance, possession of a firearm by a felon with multiple priors alleged in five counts, attempted willful deliberated and premeditated murder, and transportation of phencyclidine wherein the defendant is in custody. Trial estimate is three to four weeks.

The government does not object to the continuance.

The parties stipulate and agree that these are complex cases within the meaning of 18 U. S. C. § 3161 (h) (7) (B) (ii) and that the exclusion of time during the period needed for defense counsel's reasonable time for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence within the meaning of 18 U. S. C. § 3161 (h) (7) (B) (iv), and that the ends of justice served by granting exclusion of time therefore outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial 18 U. S. C. § 3161 (h) (7) (A), and therefore defendant agrees to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act from the date of the filing of the order until the date of the new status conference.

Respectfully submitted,

ALEX R. KESSEL

Attorney for Defendant

Jack Haroun

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

STEVEN LAPHAM

Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JOHN A. MENDEZ

United State District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Haroun

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 16, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-CR-260-JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Haroun

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JACK HAROUN Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 16, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-CR-260-JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)