From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Harkum

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 4, 2019
No. 16-7536 (4th Cir. Sep. 4, 2019)

Opinion

No. 16-7536

09-04-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES MICHAEL HARKUM, Defendant - Appellant.

James Michael Harkum, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00047-FPS-RWT-2; 1:16-cv-00123-FPS-RWT) Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Michael Harkum, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Michael Harkum appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Mathis, ___ F.3d ___, ___, No. 16-4633, 2019 WL 3437626, at *15-16 (4th Cir. July 31, 2019); United States v. McNeal, 818 F.3d 141, 152-53, 157 (4th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harkum, Nos. 1:03-cr-00047-FPS-RWT-2; 1:16-cv-00123-FPS-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Harkum

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 4, 2019
No. 16-7536 (4th Cir. Sep. 4, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Harkum

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES MICHAEL HARKUM…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 4, 2019

Citations

No. 16-7536 (4th Cir. Sep. 4, 2019)