From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Haring

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 20, 2013
No. CR 12-695 JCH (D.N.M. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR 12-695 JCH

02-20-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. ROD HARING, Defendant.


ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

The Court has reviewed Government's Notice of Supreme Court's Ruling in Bailey v. United States. (Doc. 42). In the opinion issued on February 19, 2013, in Bailey v. United States, No. 11-770, the Supreme Court held that the rule of Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692 (1981) that officers executing a search warrant are permitted to detain the occupants of the premises while a proper search is conducted is limited to the immediate vicinity of the premises to be searched and does not extend to a recent occupant of the premises who was detained at a point beyond any reasonable understanding of the immediate vicinity of the premises being searched.

The Court hereby orders both parties to submit supplemental briefing regarding the impact of the decision in Bailey v. United States on Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence, (Doc. 18), Government's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, (Doc. 40), and Defendant's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, (Doc. 41). The parties shall submit their briefs by Monday, March 4, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Haring

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 20, 2013
No. CR 12-695 JCH (D.N.M. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Haring

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. ROD HARING, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

No. CR 12-695 JCH (D.N.M. Feb. 20, 2013)