From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hardy

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 31, 1958
252 F.2d 780 (2d Cir. 1958)

Opinion

No. 169, Docket 24792.

Argued January 9, 1958.

Decided January 31, 1958. Writ of Certiorari Denied April 28, 1958. See 78 S.Ct. 791.

John T. Moran, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. S.D.N.Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Garland Alfonzo Hardy, pro se.

Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed on the opinion of Judge Cashin, D.C., 159 F. Supp. 208. As to appellant's claim of ineffective legal representation before sentence in that his counsel refused to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we also point out that a direct appeal does not lie from the denial of such a motion made after indictment. Cogen v. United States, 278 U.S. 221, 49 S.Ct. 118, 73 L. Ed. 275; Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394, 404, 77 S.Ct. 1332, 1 L.Ed.2d 1442.


Summaries of

United States v. Hardy

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 31, 1958
252 F.2d 780 (2d Cir. 1958)
Case details for

United States v. Hardy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Garland Alfonzo HARDY, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 31, 1958

Citations

252 F.2d 780 (2d Cir. 1958)

Citing Cases

United States v. Smith

With nothing in the motion papers pointing to independent evidence showing that the appellant's present…

Peterson v. United States

See Rodgers v. United States, D.C., 158 F. Supp. 670, where, beginning at page 675 the authorities are…