From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hanson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cr-00435 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cr-00435 LJO

01-26-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHERRILL V. HANSON, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: JEREMY JEHANGIRI Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender By: JEREMY S. KROGER Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant Sherrill V. Hanson


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

JEREMY S. KROGER, Bar # 258956

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

SHERRILL V. HANSON

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON


Date: April 2, 2012

Dept : Hon. Sheila K. Oberto

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the status conference hearing in the above-referenced action now scheduled for January 30, 2012, may be continued to April 2, 2012 at 1:00 p.m., before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto

The parties jointly request this continuance to allow time to conduct plea negotiations, and so that defense counsel has time to review the substantial discovery and conduct its own investigation. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for all parties and the Court.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for further defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: JEREMY JEHANGIRI

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

By: JEREMY S. KROGER

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

Sherrill V. Hanson

ORDER

Time is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hanson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cr-00435 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Hanson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHERRILL V. HANSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cr-00435 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)