Opinion
No. 18-10247
08-22-2019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MATTHEW RYAN HAND, Defendant-Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 4:17-cr-00478-RM-LCK-2 MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Matthew Ryan Hand appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(D) and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Hand contends that the district court erred by denying him a mitigating-role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. The government suggests that this argument is waived because Hand's request for the reduction in the district court was untimely. We need not resolve this issue because, even assuming the issue were properly preserved, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the reduction. See United States v. Gasca-Ruiz, 852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (application of the Guidelines to the facts is reviewed for abuse of discretion). Contrary to Hand's claim, the court did not rely on any improper considerations in denying the reduction, and the record supports the court's conclusion that Hand was not "substantially less culpable" than the other participants in the drug trafficking offense. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A). To the extent Hand argues that the court should have granted a downward variance to reflect his mitigated role, that argument also fails. The 57-month sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Hand's conduct in resisting apprehension and his extensive criminal history. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).
AFFIRMED.