From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hamm

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Jun 6, 2023
6:22-cr-00007 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 6, 2023)

Opinion

6:22-cr-00007

06-06-2023

United States of America v. Derek Robert Hamm


ORDER

J. CAMPBELL BARKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This criminal action was referred for adjudication of defendant's motion to withdraw from his plea agreement. Doc. 47. On May 5, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the motion be denied. Doc. 50. Despite receiving an extension of time, no party filed written objections.

When a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report, the court reviews the record only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. The court denies the motion to withdraw from plea agreement. Doc. 40.

So ordered.


Summaries of

United States v. Hamm

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Jun 6, 2023
6:22-cr-00007 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 6, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Hamm

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. Derek Robert Hamm

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Jun 6, 2023

Citations

6:22-cr-00007 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 6, 2023)