From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hamilton

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jan 25, 2018
No. 17-1378 (8th Cir. Jan. 25, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-1378

01-25-2018

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Markell Jay Hamilton, also known as Poo Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids [Unpublished] Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Markell Hamilton directly appeals after the he pled guilty to a drug charge, and the district court sentenced him to an above-Guidelines-range prison term. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hamilton has filed a pro se brief, arguing, as relevant, that the district court plainly erred in calculating his criminal history score by including his Illinois conviction for aggravated unlawful use of a weapon, because a portion of the relevant statute had been ruled unconstitutional by the Illinois Supreme Court and the Seventh Circuit.

After careful review of the record and the parties' arguments on appeal, we vacate Hamilton's sentence and remand for resentencing for the district court to consider Hamilton's criminal-history argument in the first instance. We express no opinion as to the merits of this argument, and we note that it is unclear from the record whether Hamilton was convicted under a portion of the statute that has been ruled unconstitutional. Counsel's motion to withdraw is denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Hamilton

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jan 25, 2018
No. 17-1378 (8th Cir. Jan. 25, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Markell Jay Hamilton…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jan 25, 2018

Citations

No. 17-1378 (8th Cir. Jan. 25, 2018)