From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ham

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 21, 2018
No. 18-6623 (4th Cir. Sep. 21, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6623

09-21-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICO HAM, a/k/a Rico Hamm, a/k/a Reco Ham, a/k/a Reco Hamm, a/k/a Rico Hamm, Jr., a/k/a Reco Hamm, Jr., Defendant - Appellant.

Rico Ham, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:13-cr-00488-JFA-1) Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rico Ham, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rico Ham seeks to appeal the district court's order ruling on a postjudgment motion. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court's order and, thus, dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

United States v. Ham

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 21, 2018
No. 18-6623 (4th Cir. Sep. 21, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Ham

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICO HAM, a/k/a Rico…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 21, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6623 (4th Cir. Sep. 21, 2018)