Opinion
Case No. 3:11-cr-0014 CMK
09-29-2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MASON L. HALPENNY, et al., Defendants.
DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys for Defendant DAVID DRATMAN Attorney for Defendant DUANE E. POOLE MICHAEL BIGELOW Attorney for Defendant NATHAN W. BIRD BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DAVID STEVENS Assistant U.S. Attorney
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424
Federal Defender
MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., Bar #177913
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorneys for Defendant
MASON L. HALPENNY
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
STATUS CONFERENCE TO DECEMBER 12,
2011, AT 10:00 A.M.
Date: October 3, 2011
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Judge: Hon. Edmund F. Brennan
THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through their respective attorneys, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for October 3, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., and reset it for December 12, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.
Defense counsel requires the continuance to confer with Mr. Halpenny and to negotiate with the government in an effort to resolve this matter.
The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through December 12, 2011, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4).
Respectfully submitted,
DANIEL BRODERICK
Federal Defender
MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr.
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorneys for Defendant
DAVID DRATMAN
Attorney for Defendant
DUANE E. POOLE
MICHAEL BIGELOW
Attorney for Defendant
NATHAN W. BIRD
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DAVID STEVENS
Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on December 12, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4). The Court also finds that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.
EDMUND F. BRENNAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE