Opinion
Case No. 3:11-cr-0014 CMK
08-02-2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MASON L. HALPENNY, et al., Defendants.
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., Bar #177913 Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys for Defendant MASON L. HALPENNY
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424
Federal Defender
MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., Bar #177913
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorneys for Defendant
MASON L. HALPENNY
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS
CONFERENCE TO OCTOBER 3, 2011, AT 10:00 A.M.
Date: August 8, 2011
Judge: Hon. Edmund F. Brennan
THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through their respective attorneys, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for August 8, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., and reset it for October 3, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.
Defense counsel requires the continuance to confer with Mr. Halpenny and to negotiate with the government in an effort to resolve this matter.
The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through October 3, 2011, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4).
Respectfully submitted,
DANIEL BRODERICK
Federal Defender
MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr.
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorneys for Defendant
DAVID DRATMAN
Attorney for Defendant
DUANE E. POOLE
MICHAEL BIGELOW
Attorney for Defendant
NATHAN W. BIRD
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
JUSTIN LEE
Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on October 3, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4). The Court also finds that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.
EDMUND F. BRENNAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE