From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Halpain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 23, 2011
NO. Cr. S. 11-0005-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)

Opinion

NO. Cr. S. 11-0005-MCE

09-23-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BENJAMIN CAMERON HALPAIN Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender MATTHEW M. SCOBLE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant BENJAMIN HALPAIN


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424

Federal Defender

MATTHEW M. SCOBLE Bar #237432

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

MATTHEW M. SCOBLE

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY PRETRIAL CONDITIONS

On January 12, 2011, Mr. Halpain made his first appearance on an indictment filed by the government. The Court released Mr. Halpain on several pretrial conditions and under the supervision of the Pretrial Services Office. Among the conditions of release, the defendant was not to possess a computer in his residence. The defendant's performance while on pre-trial release has been exemplary. The defendant lives with his sister, brother-in-law, and girlfriend. All of whom need access to computers and the internet. These individuals have been supportive of the defendant and instrumental in his ability to work well with pre-trial services. In light of the defendant's excellent performance on supervision, and the needs of his friends and family, the defense hereby requests that the Court modify Mr. Halpain's pretrial release to include the following condition:

There may be up to three (3) computers in the defendant's residence for use by other people. The defendant is not to have access to any of these computers. Any computer in the defendant's residence must be secured by the use of: a 'dongle' security device, a password, a physical barrier [e.g. locked door or cabinet], or another security method, as approved by the Pretrial Services Officer.
Pretrial Services Officer Taifa Gaskins concurs with this request. The government does not oppose the requested modification.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

MATTHEW M. SCOBLE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

BENJAMIN HALPAIN

ORDER

Although this paper is described as a "stipulation," there are no signatures on it aside form the moving party. Generally, such a mis-identified document would not be signed. However, in this case, the undersigned accepts the representation of defense counsel that neither Pretrial Service nor the United States Attorney opposes the modification. The conditions of pretrial release are hereby modified to include the above computer condition.

SO ORDERED

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Halpain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 23, 2011
NO. Cr. S. 11-0005-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Halpain

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BENJAMIN CAMERON HALPAIN Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 23, 2011

Citations

NO. Cr. S. 11-0005-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)