Opinion
CRIMINAL ACTION 5:22-cr-00006-TES-CHW-2 CIVIL ACTION 5:24-cv-00047-TES-CHW
10-17-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. TAMARA HALL, Defendant/Movant.
ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE
Neither party objected to the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [Doc. 453], and the time period prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) has expired. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) in connection with Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a)(1) & (d). Having reviewed the R&R for clear error, the Court ADOPTS it [Doc. 453] and MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Movant's Section 2255 Motion [Doc. 423]. Further, the Court DENIES Movant a certificate of appealability because she has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(c)(2); see also Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000).
SO ORDERED.