From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Haddock

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 23, 2006
202 F. App'x 969 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Dennis J. Dimsey, Esq., DOJ--U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division/Appellate Section, Dirk C. Phillips, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Steven V. Richert, Esq., Federal Defenders Eastern Washington and Idaho, Pocatello, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-00072-BLW.

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Mark Haddock appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for deprivation of rights under color of law, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242.

We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Jeronimo, 398 F.3d 1149, 1152-53 (9th Cir.2005) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Haddock

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 23, 2006
202 F. App'x 969 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Haddock

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark HADDOCK…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 23, 2006

Citations

202 F. App'x 969 (9th Cir. 2006)