From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Haber

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nov 28, 1951
192 F.2d 575 (3d Cir. 1951)

Opinion

No. 10517.

Argued November 12, 1951.

Decided November 28, 1951.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Thomas F. Meaney, Judge.

Charles A. Stanziale, Newark, N.J., (George R. Sommer, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellant.

Charles J. Tyne, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., (Grover C. Richman, Jr., U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARIS, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.


The arguments advanced by the appellant in his brief and on oral argument have had our careful consideration. We are satisfied, however, from our examination of the record that the district court did not err in admitting into evidence the physical exhibits and other evidence objected to by the appellant, that the evidence amply supported the verdict of guilty and that the trial judge did not err in his charge to the jury or in refusing certain of appellant's requests for charge. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Haber

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nov 28, 1951
192 F.2d 575 (3d Cir. 1951)
Case details for

United States v. Haber

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America v. George HABER, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Nov 28, 1951

Citations

192 F.2d 575 (3d Cir. 1951)