From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Guzman-Arreguin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. 1:11-cr-00241 AWI (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:11-cr-00241 AWI

09-28-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ELIODORO GUZMAN-ARREGUIN, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney IAN GARRIQUES Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender ERIC V. KERSTEN Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant Eliodoro Guzman-Arreguin


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

Eliodoro Guzman-Arreguin

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, IAN GARRIQUES, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for plaintiff, and ERIC V. KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant Eliodoro Guzman-Arreguin, that the date for status conference in this matter may be continued to October 24, 2011, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is October 3, 2011. The requested new date is October 24, 2011.

This continuance is requested to allow additional time for Mr. Guzman-Arreguin to consider the pending plea offer.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded as necessary for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By IAN GARRIQUES

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

By ERIC V. KERSTEN

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

Eliodoro Guzman-Arreguin

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Guzman-Arreguin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. 1:11-cr-00241 AWI (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Guzman-Arreguin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ELIODORO GUZMAN-ARREGUIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

No. 1:11-cr-00241 AWI (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)