From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Guzman-Arreguin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
No. 1:11-cr-00241 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:11-cr-00241 AWI

01-26-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ELIODORO GUZMAN-ARREGUIN, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant Eliodoro Guzman-Arreguin


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

Eliodoro Guzman-Arreguin

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER THEREON


Judge: Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, IAN GARRIQUES, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for plaintiff, and ERIC KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for defendant Eliodoro Guzman-Arreguin, that the date for status conference in this matter may be continued to February 13, 2012, or the soonest date thereafter that is convenient to the court. The date currently set for status conference is January 30, 2012. The requested new date is February 13, 2012.

The parties are currently engaged in plea negotiations. This continuance is requested to allow additional time for negotiations to continue, and for Mr. Guzman-Arreguin to consider the anticipated revised plea offer.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded as necessary for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By ____________

IAN GARRIQUES

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

By ____________

ERIC V. KERSTEN

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

Eliodoro Guzman-Arreguin

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Guzman-Arreguin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 26, 2012
No. 1:11-cr-00241 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Guzman-Arreguin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ELIODORO GUZMAN-ARREGUIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

No. 1:11-cr-00241 AWI (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)